Pressured On Opium Crops, Many Afghan Farmers
Switch To Cannabis
By Ron Synovitz
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
March 7, 2009
Opium-poppy eradication has been hailed as a
success in much of Afghanistan's north and east,
allowing counternarcotics officials to declare 18
provinces there as "poppy-free" despite record opium
cultivation in the south and southwest.
But UN officials tell RFE/RL that many former opium
farmers in those poppy-free areas have switched to
another lucrative and illegal drug crop: cannabis.
As a result, the United Nations Office on Drugs and
Crime (UNODC) says, Afghanistan is now the world's
largest producer of two illegal drugs -- heroin from
opium poppies and cannabis.
The UNODC's latest assessment on the Afghan
narcotics trade, released in February, says
cultivation of opium poppies in Afghanistan is likely
to fall this year compared to the record crops of
previous years.
It says the 18 provinces labeled "opium-free" in
2008 will probably remain so in 2009. It also says
seven other Afghan provinces are likely to reduce
opium-poppy cultivation this year -- including the
biggest opium-producing province, Helmand, in the
volatile south.
That means opium cultivation in Afghanistan is now
overwhelmingly concentrated within the seven most
unstable provinces in the south and southwest.
But officials in neighboring countries say the size
and frequency of drug seizures from smugglers near the
Afghan border continues to increase -- highlighting
the fact that many Afghan farmers who have stopped
growing opium poppies are now growing cannabis crops
instead.
In Plain View
UNODC spokesman Walter Kemp tells RFE/RL it is
becoming "increasingly obvious" that the successes of
opium-eradication programs in parts of Afghanistan are
being offset by record cannabis cultivation:
"In Afghanistan, most of the attention is on
opium," Kemp says. "But Afghanistan is now one of the
biggest, if not the biggest, producer of cannabis in
the world. This is often in provinces that have become
opium-free. So we do have concerns that although some
provinces are becoming opium free, they are not
completely drug-free because they are growing
cannabis."
Reports from RFE/RL correspondents in northern
Afghanistan suggest that many farmers who used to grow
opium poppies have responded to the pressure of poppy
eradication programs by growing cannabis instead.
In fact, UNODC data suggest that more than 70,000
hectares of Afghan farmland is now being used to grow
cannabis -- putting Afghanistan ahead of Morroco as
the leading producer of cannabis and hashish made from
cannabis.
Kemp admits that eradication efforts in recent
years have been so focused on opium cultivation that
cannabis farming has been able to proliferate:
"There's been a lot of focus on the opium
cultivation -- and therefore opium eradication or
finding alternatives to opium," Kemp says. "Less
attention has been on finding out exactly how much
cannabis there is, and also using development
incentives and security deterrents to reduce the
problem of cannabis cultivation."
Bigger And Badder
Security experts say local Afghan militia
commanders who once funded their private armies with
profits from the illegal opium and heroin trades still
have their smuggling networks in place. But now,
instead of sneaking relatively small packages of opium
or heroin out of Afghanistan, drug traffickers
increasingly smuggle larger shipments of hashish, made
from cannabis.
Bobojon Shafei, a spokesman for Tajikistan's
counternarcotics police, tells RFE/RL that the size
and number of narcotics shipments being seized at the
Afghan border continues to increase.
"Drug smuggling from Afghanistan to Tajikistan
[has] only increased," Shafei says. "You know in
comparison with 2007, last year's production of drugs
in Afghanistan increased. If we look at the first two
months of this year, we can see that confiscation of
drugs has increased. That is why we can confirm
[overall] production of drugs [in Afghanistan] has
increased."
A recent attack on Tajik counternarcotics officers
near Afghanistan's northern border has raised concerns
in Dushanbe about the power and boldness of
traffickers with ties to Afghan drug lords in the
so-called opium-free provinces.
Local officials in Tajikistan's southern Khation
Province tell RFE/RL that about 30 gunmen attacked the
border crossing at Sari Ghor on the night of February
27, killing two officers and injuring at least three
border guards before fleeing back to the Afghan side
of the border.
Shafei says the attackers included smugglers from
both sides of the border. Shafei also suggests that
Tajik authorities let down their guard because they
had not seen such a violent attack in the area for
years:
"We did not expect that smugglers would be heavily
armed," Shafei said. "We did not expect that
drug-smugglers from [the Tajik] side and their
accomplices from the Afghan side of the border would
attack our officers. It is the first such case in
several years."
Officials in Dushanbe say the killing of the Tajik
counternarcotics officers may have been a retribution
attack by drug smugglers. Several weeks earlier, Tajik
border guards had killed six Afghan smugglers and
confiscated a large amount of narcotics -- including
hashish from cannabis -- that they were trying to
smuggle into Tajikistan.
Subsistence Question
The Afghan government has launched
poppy-eradication programs across Afghanistan with
varying degrees of success. One complication is that
many poor Afghan farmers have become dependent on the
income they can earn from narcotics.
Internationally backed Afghan government
eradication programs aim to help farmers develop
alternative crops as a source of livelihood -- from
fruits and vegetable crops, to spices or even fish
farming.
But farmers who have joined those programs --
sometimes after having their poppy crops destroyed --
complain that the income from growing legitimate food
crops does not come close to the amount of money they
earned from opium poppies or cannabis.
There also is debate within NATO about whether
NATO-led ISAF troops should get involved in
drug-eradication efforts, which some alliance members
consider to be an issue for law enforcement rather
than military troops.
General John Craddock, NATO's supreme allied
commander in Europe, said during a visit to
Afghanistan in December that he was surprised to
discover a gap between the approval by NATO defense
ministers of aggressive counternarcotics missions in
Afghanistan and the actual conduct of NATO troops
there.
NATO officials in Brussels have declined to list
the countries that oppose widening NATO's ISAF mandate
to include attacks on narcotics networks. And no
country has publicly expressed legal objections to a
wider counternarcotics mandate.
But several NATO countries have described their
reluctance publicly -- including Germany, Italy,
Poland, and Spain.
RFE/RL's Tajik Service contributed to this report
--------------------------------
|